Posted by
Thauer, R. K., Kaster, A.-K., Seedorf, H., Buckel, W. & Hedderich, R. Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 579–591 (2008).
Garcia, P. S., Gribaldo, S. & Borrel, G. Diversity and evolution of methane-related pathways in archaea. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 76, 727–755 (2022).
Borrel, G. et al. Wide diversity of methane and short-chain alkane metabolisms in uncultured archaea. Nat Microbiol 4, 603–613 (2019).
Wang, Y., Wegener, G., Hou, J., Wang, F. & Xiao, X. Expanding anaerobic alkane metabolism in the domain of Archaea. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 595–602 (2019).
Evans, P. N. et al. Methane metabolism in the archaeal phylum Bathyarchaeota revealed by genome-centric metagenomics. Science 350, 434–438 (2015).
Vanwonterghem, I. et al. Methylotrophic methanogenesis discovered in the archaeal phylum Verstraetearchaeota. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 1–9 (2016).
Saunois, M. et al. The Global Methane Budget 2000-2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 1561–1623 (2020).
Conrad, R. The global methane cycle: recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 1, 285–292 (2009).
Thauer, R. K. Methyl (Alkyl)-Coenzyme M reductases: nickel F-430-containing enzymes involved in anaerobic methane formation and in anaerobic oxidation of methane or of short chain alkanes. Biochemistry 58, 5198–5220 (2019).
Evans, P. N. et al. An evolving view of methane metabolism in the Archaea. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 219–232 (2019).
Stephenson, M. & Stickland, L. H. Hydrogenase: the bacterial formation of methane by the reduction of one-carbon compounds by molecular hydrogen. Biochem. J. 27, 1517–1527 (1933).
Rinke, C. et al. A standardized archaeal taxonomy for the Genome Taxonomy Database. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 946–959 (2021).
Seitz, K. W. et al. Asgard archaea capable of anaerobic hydrocarbon cycling. Nat. Commun. 10, 1822 (2019).
McKay, L. J. et al. Co-occurring genomic capacity for anaerobic methane metabolism and dissimilatory sulfite reduction discovered in the Korarchaeota. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 614–622 (2019).
McKay, L. J., Hatzenpichler, R., Inskeep, W. P. & Fields, M. W. Occurrence and expression of novel methyl-coenzyme M reductase gene (mcrA) variants in hot spring sediments. Sci. Rep. 7, 7252 (2017).
Hua, Z.-S. et al. Insights into the ecological roles and evolution of methyl-coenzyme M reductase-containing hot spring Archaea. Nat. Commun. 10, 4574 (2019).
Lynes, M. M. et al. Diversity and function of methyl-coenzyme M reductase-encoding archaea in Yellowstone hot springs revealed by metagenomics and mesocosm experiments. ISME Commun. 3, 22 (2023).
Buessecker, S. et al. Mcr-dependent methanogenesis in Archaeoglobaceae enriched from a terrestrial hot spring. ISME J. 17, 1649–1659 (2023).
Wang, J. et al. Evidence for nontraditional mcr-containing archaea contributing to biological methanogenesis in geothermal springs. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg6004 (2023).
Lynes, M. M., Jay, Z. J., Kohtz, A. J. & Hatzenpichler, R. Methylotrophic methanogenesis in the Archaeoglobi revealed by cultivation of Ca. Methanoglobus hypatiae from a Yellowstone hot spring. ISME J. 18, wrae026 (2024).
Liu, Y.-F. et al. Long-term cultivation and meta-omics reveal methylotrophic methanogenesis in hydrocarbon-impacted habitats. Engineering 24, 264–275 (2023).
Oren, A., Garrity, G. M., Parker, C. T., Chuvochina, M. & Trujillo, M. E. Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70, 3956–4042 (2020).
Zeikus, J., Ben-Bassat, A. & Hegge, P. Microbiology of methanogenesis in thermal, volcanic environments. J. Bacteriol. 143, 432–440 (1980).
McKay, L. J., Klingelsmith, K. B., Deutschbauer, A. M., Inskeep, W. P. & Fields, M. W. Draft genome sequence of Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus WHS, a thermophilic hydrogenotrophic methanogen from Washburn Hot Springs in Yellowstone National Park, USA. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 10, e01157–01120 (2021).
Cheng, L., Dai, L., Li, X., Zhang, H. & Lu, Y. Isolation and characterization of Methanothermobacter crinale sp. nov., a novel hydrogenotrophic methanogen from the Shengli oil field. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 5212–5219 (2011).
Balk, M., Weijma, J. & Stams, A. J. Thermotoga lettingae sp. nov., a novel thermophilic, methanol-degrading bacterium isolated from a thermophilic anaerobic reactor. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52, 1361–1368 (2002).
Paulo, P. et al. Pathways of methanol conversion in a thermophilic anaerobic (55 C) sludge consortium. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 63, 307–314 (2003).
Hatzenpichler, R., Krukenberg, V., Spietz, R. L. & Jay, Z. J. Next-generation physiology approaches to study microbiome function at single cell level. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 18, 241–256 (2020).
Hatzenpichler, R. et al. Visualizing in situ translational activity for identifying and sorting slow-growing archaeal− bacterial consortia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E4069–E4078 (2016).
Wu, K. et al. Isolation of a methyl-reducing methanogen outside the Euryarchaeota. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07728-y (2024).
Kohtz, A. J., Jay, Z. J., Lynes, M. M., Krukenberg, V. & Hatzenpichler, R. Culexarchaeia, a novel archaeal class of anaerobic generalists inhabiting geothermal environments. ISME Commun. 2, 1–13 (2022).
Major, T. A., Liu, Y. & Whitman, W. B. Characterization of energy-conserving hydrogenase B in Methanococcus maripaludis. J. Bacteriol. 192, 4022–4030 (2010).
Ma, K., Schicho, R. N., Kelly, R. M. & Adams, M. Hydrogenase of the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus is an elemental sulfur reductase or sulfhydrogenase: evidence for a sulfur-reducing hydrogenase ancestor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 5341–5344 (1993).
Lang, K. et al. New mode of energy metabolism in the seventh order of methanogens as revealed by comparative genome analysis of “Candidatus Methanoplasma termitum”. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 1338–1352 (2015).
Loh, H. Q., Hervé, V. & Brune, A. Metabolic potential for reductive acetogenesis and a novel energy-converting [NiFe] hydrogenase in Bathyarchaeia from termite guts–A genome-centric analysis. Front. Microbiol. 11, 635786 (2021).
Kröninger, L., Berger, S., Welte, C. & Deppenmeier, U. Evidence for the involvement of two heterodisulfide reductases in the energy‐conserving system of Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis. FEBS J. 283, 472–483 (2016).
Kröninger, L. et al. Energy conservation in the gut microbe Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis is based on membrane‐bound ferredoxin oxidation coupled to heterodisulfide reduction. FEBS J. 286, 3831–3843 (2019).
Bryant, M., Campbell, L. L., Reddy, C. & Crabill, M. Growth of Desulfovibrio in lactate or ethanol media low in sulfate in association with H2-utilizing methanogenic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33, 1162–1169 (1977).
McInerney, M. J. & Bryant, M. P. Anaerobic degradation of lactate by syntrophic associations of Methanosarcina barkeri and Desulfovibrio species and effect of H2 on acetate degradation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41, 346–354 (1981).
Hwang, W. C. et al. LUD, a new protein domain associated with lactate utilization. BMC Bioinf. 14, 1–9 (2013).
Young, L. N. & Villa, E. Bringing Structure to Cell Biology with Cryo-Electron Tomography. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 52, 573–595 (2023).
Briegel, A. et al. Structural conservation of chemotaxis machinery across A rchaea and B acteria. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 7, 414–419 (2015).
Albers, S.-V. & Jarrell, K. F. The archaellum: an update on the unique archaeal motility structure. Trends Microbiol. 26, 351–362 (2018).
Quax, T. E., Albers, S.-V. & Pfeiffer, F. Taxis in archaea. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 2, 535–546 (2018).
Baidya, A. K., Bhattacharya, S., Dubey, G. P., Mamou, G. & Ben-Yehuda, S. Bacterial nanotubes: a conduit for intercellular molecular trade. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 42, 1–6 (2018).
Liu, J. et al. Extracellular membrane vesicles and nanotubes in Archaea. microLife 2, uqab007 (2021).
Sivabalasarma, S. et al. Analysis of cell–cell bridges in Haloferax volcanii using electron cryo-tomography reveal a continuous cytoplasm and S-layer. Front. Microbiol. 11, 612239 (2021).
Brandis, A. & Thauer, R. K. Growth of Desulfovibrio species on hydrogen and sulphate as sole energy source. Microbiology 126, 249–252 (1981).
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2012).
Ludwig, W. et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1363–1371 (2004).
Stoecker, K., Dorninger, C., Daims, H. & Wagner, M. Double labeling of oligonucleotide probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization (DOPE-FISH) improves signal intensity and increases rRNA accessibility. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 922–926 (2010).
Stahl, D. A. in Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics (eds Stackebrandt, E. & Goodfellow, M.) 205–248 (Wiley, 1991).
Wallner, G., Amann, R. & Beisker, W. Optimizing fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA‐targeted oligonucleotide probes for flow cytometric identification of microorganisms. Cytom.: J. Int. Soc. Anal. Cytol. 14, 136–143 (1993).
Daims, H. Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization and the daime image analysis program for the cultivation-independent quantification of microorganisms in environmental and medical samples. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009, pdb. prot5253 (2009).
Daims, H., Lücker, S. & Wagner, M. Daime, a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research. Environ. Microbiol. 8, 200–213 (2006).
Zhou, J., Bruns, M. A. & Tiedje, J. M. DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 316–322 (1996).
Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A. & Pevzner, P. A. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome research 27, 824–834 (2017).
Bushnell, B. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner (Lawrence Berkeley National Lab., 2014).
Wu, Y.-W., Tang, Y.-H., Tringe, S. G., Simmons, B. A. & Singer, S. W. MaxBin: an automated binning method to recover individual genomes from metagenomes using an expectation-maximization algorithm. Microbiome 2, 1–18 (2014).
Alneberg, J. et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat. Methods 11, 1144–1146 (2014).
Kang, D. D. et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7, e7359 (2019).
Miller, I. J. et al. Autometa: automated extraction of microbial genomes from individual shotgun metagenomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e57–e57 (2019).
Sieber, C. M. et al. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 836–843 (2018).
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Kolmogorov, M. et al. metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome assembly using repeat graphs. Nat. Methods 17, 1103–1110 (2020).
Wick, R. R. & Holt, K. E. Polypolish: short-read polishing of long-read bacterial genome assemblies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1009802 (2022).
Zimin, A. V. & Salzberg, S. L. The genome polishing tool POLCA makes fast and accurate corrections in genome assemblies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007981 (2020).
Apprill, A., McNally, S., Parsons, R. & Weber, L. Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806 R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 75, 129–137 (2015).
Parada, A. E., Needham, D. M. & Fuhrman, J. A. Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1403–1414 (2016).
Reichart, N. J. et al. Activity-based cell sorting reveals responses of uncultured archaea and bacteria to substrate amendment. ISME J. 14, 2851–2861 (2020).
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).
Nawrocki, E. P., Kolbe, D. L. & Eddy, S. R. Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics 25, 1335–1337 (2009).
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K., Von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. S. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589 (2017).
Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307–321 (2010).
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).
Lu, S. et al. CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D265–D268 (2020).
Zimmermann, L. et al. A completely reimplemented MPI bioinformatics toolkit with a new HHpred server at its core. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 2237–2243 (2018).
Chen, I.-M. A. et al. IMG/M v. 5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D666–D677 (2019).
Søndergaard, D., Pedersen, C. N. & Greening, C. HydDB: a web tool for hydrogenase classification and analysis. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–8 (2016).
Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 14, 417–419 (2017).
Ai, G., Zhu, J., Dong, X. & Sun, T. Simultaneous characterization of methane and carbon dioxide produced by cultured methanogens using gas chromatography/isotope ratio mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 27, 1935–1944 (2013).
Lagkouvardos, I. et al. IMNGS: a comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNA microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–9 (2016).
Iancu, C. V. et al. Electron cryotomography sample preparation using the Vitrobot. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2813–2819 (2006).
Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996).
Mastronarde, D. Correction for non‐perpendicularity of beam and tilt axis in tomographic reconstructions with the IMOD package. J. Microsc. 230, 212–217 (2008).
Tegunov, D. & Cramer, P. Real-time cryo-electron microscopy data preprocessing with Warp. Nat. Methods 16, 1146–1152 (2019).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Schaible, G. A., Kohtz, A. J., Cliff, J. & Hatzenpichler, R. Correlative SIP-FISH-Raman-SEM-NanoSIMS links identity, morphology, biochemistry, and physiology of environmental microbes. ISME Commun. 2, 52 (2022).
Fernando, E. Y. et al. Resolving the individual contribution of key microbial populations to enhanced biological phosphorus removal with Raman–FISH. ISME J. 13, 1933–1946 (2019).
Majed, N. & Gu, A. Z. Application of Raman microscopy for simultaneous and quantitative evaluation of multiple intracellular polymers dynamics functionally relevant to enhanced biological phosphorus removal processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 8601–8608 (2010).